A certain percentage of he population believe in the idea of evolution as a source of humanities origin. Is this not the idea that humanity authored itself?
If that is incorrect, is it not the idea that a single-celled organism authored itself?
If that idea is incorrect, is it not the idea that certain elements authored themselves?
If that idea is incorrect, is it not the idea that oceans, seas and lakes which gave rise to life, authored themselves?
If that idea is incorrect, is it not the idea that the earth, which gave rise to the waters, authored itself?
If that idea is incorrect is it not the idea that the universe, of which the earth is a part, authored itself?
If that idea is incorrect, is it not the idea that creation, which gave rise to the universe, authored itself?
The idea of evolution which is heavily backed by the scientific community, can’t possibly be true in the “largest” sense.
Evolution is the idea of change or progressive development over a span of “time.” The formula at its most basic level is,… cause (subject matter) + time = effect (evolution). Without the idea of time, there can be no evolution.
Time is like the color red, which exists as part of the color spectrum, but is not the whole color spectrum. This means that in many examples of reality the color red will be absent.
The color red is not a prerequisite for the existence of that which constitutes reality. In this same way, time is apart of the totality that is creation, however, time is not a prerequisite to all parts of creation.
In fact time is not represented in most of creation, but only in certain aspects of it. In other words time is not a prerequisite to creation, and does not exist everywhere within it.
In the third dimension there is time, and the possibility of evolution, therefore the idea of believing that life somehow authored itself can not be easily discounted. Outside of the third dimension, time may or may not exist, depending on what aspect of creation you are referring to.
Where time does not exist, then neither does evolution which is dependent on time. Now the question remains as to whether creation gave rise to itself, and the answer is yes it did, because creation itself is God manifested, and God is the first and only reality.
It is pointless to argue which came first the chicken or the egg when they both came from the same source, and so neither came first. “Source” means exactly that, the source of everything is that which came first.
God is all that is, and all that is not (potential). Creation is intelligence. Intelligence is visible throughout all of creation, but what is the source of that intelligence?
Evolution or creation is not the pertinent question. The real question is what or who, is the source of intelligence (or consciousness) that drives and supports all of creation?
Whatever that form that intelligence takes, it is the reality we have come to call God.
No comments:
Post a Comment